<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Björn Kahlert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bkahlert.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bkahlert.com/blog</link>
	<description>Web Design / Programming / Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:17:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why I don&#8217;t consider bit.ly &amp; co a good idea</title>
		<link>http://www.bkahlert.com/blog/2010/05/why-i-dont-consider-bit-ly-co-as-a-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bkahlert.com/blog/2010/05/why-i-dont-consider-bit-ly-co-as-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Björn Kahlert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bkahlert.com/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever heard of bit.ly or&#160;TinyURL.com?
In short those services offer the shortening of (long) URLs so the link becomes easier to read and to publish, e.g. on Twitter. I do not deny that advantage whereas I criticize that none of the providers I know states the disadvantages.
Transparency
People like to know what they click on because their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of <a target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly">bit.ly</a> or&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com">TinyURL.com</a>?<br />
In short those services offer the shortening of (long) URLs so the link becomes easier to read and to publish, e.g. on <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>. I do not deny that advantage whereas I criticize that none of the providers I know states the disadvantages.</p>
<h3>Transparency</h3>
<p>People like to know what they click on because their<b> </b>decision whether to click on the link not only depends on the surrounding text but also on the link itself.<br />
At least I wouldn't never click on a link titled malevolent.com.</p>
<h3>Search Engine Optimization (SEO)</h3>
<p>I really don't get why people who state that they know how SEO works use bit.ly &amp; co.<br />
What would you say is ranked better?<br />
A speaking link like <a target="_blank" href="http://seo.xy/into-the-depth">more information on SEO</a> or <a target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly/xyzskSh23">bit.ly/xyzskSh23</a>?</p>
<h3>Availability</h3>
<p>Who says bit.ly &amp; co stills exists in 2 years? No one.<br />
All links based on those providers simply won't work anymore...</p>
<h3>Abuse</h3>
<p>There are people who don't want specific information to be spread or to be accessible.<br />
By providing a single point of access only that point needs to be controlled by whoever is interested in.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bkahlert.com/blog/2010/05/why-i-dont-consider-bit-ly-co-as-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
